Friday, August 31, 2012

Plot vs Subplot

Sam Heilshorn



Plot vs Subplot 

    I feel that there is a great resemblance between father/children plots in this story.  Some of the areas where I see the resemblance is how each father lost trust of their child who loved them the most and that each father also trusted the child or children who did not love them.  I also see similarities in the fact that the prompt mentioned how King Lear was losing his eyesight and Gloucester literally lost his eyes.  To basically summarize King Lear asked his daughters who loved him the most and while two of his daughters lied to him to receive the most inheritance his one daughter remained silent and was then excommunicated by King lear.  The summary of what happened to Gloucester is his bastard son came up with a lie that his legitimate son was trying to kill him as a plot for the bastard son to get his inheritance.  Gloucester set out to kill his legitimate son as he had been tricked into thinking that he was trying to kill him.  The funny part about both of these stories is that things are not always as they seem as Gloucester's legitimate son Edgar loved him the most out of all his children and King Lear's daughter who would not lie about her love of him actually loved him the most. 

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Sam Heilshorn

Lear's Fool


In all honesty I do not understand the role of the "fool" in this play.  I tried very hard to figure out why he was in the play at all.  Now I know that I should have done more research to figure out why he was included in this play, but then thought to myself that he was such a minor character that I was not going to bother with the research.  He was such a minor character that when he was written off towards the end of the third act that I did not even notice.  In my opinion the role of the fool in this play was to add comic relief.  Also, I have no idea to why he disappeared when he did or why he would disappear at all.